Use of Runs Statistics for Pattern Recognition in Genomic DNA Sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the use of the finite Markov chain imbedding (FMCI) technique to study patterns in DNA under a hidden Markov model (HMM) is introduced. With a vision of studying multiple runs-related statistics simultaneously under an HMM through the FMCI technique, this work establishes an investigation of a bivariate runs statistic under a binary HMM for DNA pattern recognition. An FMCI-based recursive algorithm is derived and implemented for the determination of the exact distribution of this bivariate runs statistic under an independent identically distributed (IID) framework, a Markov chain (MC) framework, and a binary HMM framework. With this algorithm, we have studied the distributions of the bivariate runs statistic under different binary HMM parameter sets; probabilistic profiles of runs are created and shown to be useful for trapping HMM maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs). This MLE-trapping scheme offers good initial estimates to jump-start the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm in HMM parameter estimation and helps prevent the EM estimates from landing on a local maximum or a saddle point. Applications of the bivariate runs statistic and the probabilistic profiles in conjunction with binary HMMs for pattern recognition in genomic DNA sequences are illustrated via case studies on DNA bendability signals using human DNA data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".