MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052987107 · doi:10.2174/1568005014606143

Lipopolysaccharide as a Target for the Development of Novel Therapeutics in Gram-Negative Bacteria

2001· review· en· W2052987107 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy A. Yethon, Christopher Whitfield

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Drug Targets - Infectious Disorders · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipopolysaccharideGram-negative bacteriaLipid ABacteriaBiosynthesisFunction (biology)In vitroComputational biologyBiologyChemistryBiochemistryMicrobiologyCell biologyEscherichia coliImmunologyEnzymeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) constitutes the lipid portion of the outer leaflet of Gram-negative bacteria, and is essential for growth. LPS is also known to be responsible for the variety of biological effects associated with Gram-negative sepsis. In recent years, tremendous progress has been made in determining the exact chemical structure of this highly complex macromolecule, and recent advances have elucidated much of the enzymology involved in its biosynthesis. Using this knowledge, a number of inhibitors to LPS biosynthesis have been developed: some of these compounds have antibacterial properties, while others show excellent in vitro activity and are undergoing further investigation. This review summarizes the main features of LPS structure, function, and biosynthesis, highlighting the potential target reactions that have been or might be exploited for therapeutic intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Drug Targets - Infectious DisordersSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207