MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053068593 · doi:10.3103/s1066530713010043

The bias and risk functions of some Stein-rules in elliptically contoured distributions

2013· article· en· W2053068593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Methods of Statistics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEstimatorSubspace topologyMathematicsGaussianClass (philosophy)Applied mathematicsShrinkageMatrix (chemical analysis)Random matrixDistribution (mathematics)Scatter matrixRandom variateStatisticsMathematical analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRandom variableEigenvalues and eigenvectorsPhysicsEstimation of covariance matrices

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we derive the bias and risk functions of a class of shrinkage estimators of several mean parameter matrices of matrix-variate elliptically contoured distributions. More specifically, we generalize some recent findings in three ways. First, the class of distributions under consideration is more general than the Gaussian distribution case, which is often studied in literature. Second, the uncertain subspace candidate is more general than that considered in literature. Finally, we generalize some recent identities, which are useful in establishing the risk and the bias of matrix shrinkage estimators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it