FORCED‐AIR COOLING AFTER AIR‐SHIPMENT DELAYS ASPARAGUS DETERIORATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Asparagus (cv. Locullus) was stored at 20C for 20 h to simulate time delays and temperature typically encountered during air‐shipment operations. After that period, asparagus were immediately forced‐air cooled at 1C, or room cooled at 1C or 10C, or stored at 20C to simulate different facility conditions usually available at the airports. The objective of this work was to determine which cooling method should be applied to limit the degradation of asparagus after a temperature abuse during ground and in‐flight operations. Forced‐air cooled asparagus gained in average one to three days of shelf‐life when compared to room cooled asparagus at 1C and 10C, and five to seven days when compared with asparagus stored at 20C. Results from this study illustrate that whenever a load of warm asparagus arrives to the airport facilities a forced‐air cooling treatment at 1C may be applied to delay product deterioration without causing chilling injury symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".