MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053572557 · doi:10.1145/2063576.2063952

Suggesting ghost edges for a smaller world

2011· article· en· W2053572557 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisseminationComputer scienceSmall-world networkShortest path problemPath (computing)Network topologyRange (aeronautics)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionTopology (electrical circuits)Theoretical computer scienceAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComplex networkCombinatoricsComputer networkGraphWorld Wide WebTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small changes in the network topology can have dramatic effects on its capacity to disseminate information. In this paper, we consider the problem of adding a small number of ghost edges in the network in order to minimize the average shortest-path distance between nodes, towards a smaller-world network. We formalize the problem of suggesting ghost edges and we propose a novel method for quickly evaluating the importance of ghost edges in sparse graphs. Through experiments on real and synthetic data sets, we demonstrate that our approach performs very well, for a varying range of conditions, and it outperforms sensible baselines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207