MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053703930 · doi:10.1109/tap.2012.2207672

Loss Reduction in Reflectarray Designs Using Sub-Wavelength Coupled-Resonant Elements

2012· article· en· W2053703930 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavelengthMaterials scienceLossy compressionReduction (mathematics)Bandwidth (computing)OpticsOptoelectronicsEtching (microfabrication)Loop (graph theory)Phase (matter)Layer (electronics)Drop (telecommunication)MicrostripSubstrate (aquarium)Computer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel design approach is proposed for designing high performance reflectarrays using low-cost, lossy substrates. Using sub-wavelength coupled-resonant elements, in particular sub-wavelength loops, one can dramatically reduce losses in reflectarrays and not incur significant gain drop due to the use of the lossy, low-cost substrate. It is further shown that the sub-wavelength loop achieves sufficient phase variation in a single layer design with a modest requirement in etching tolerance, making the loop superior to both the single and double-layer sub-wavelength patch elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it