MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053783605 · doi:10.1021/ma049621t

Secondary Reactions in the High-Temperature Free Radical Polymerization of Butyl Acrylate

2004· article· en· W2053783605 on OpenAlexaff
Adam N. F. Peck, Robin A. Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonomerPolymerizationPolymer chemistryAcrylateRadical polymerizationMacromonomerChemistryKinetic chain lengthPolymerBulk polymerizationSolution polymerizationAcrylate polymerCobalt-mediated radical polymerizationButyl acrylatePhotochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Secondary reactions have a marked effect on butyl acrylate polymerization rate and polymer structure under the high-temperature free radical reaction conditions typically used for production of solvent-based acrylic coatings resins. The low monomer concentrations characteristic of semibatch starved-feed reactor operation lead to significant rates of intramolecular transfer, resulting in a tertiary radical center capable of termination, monomer addition, or β-scission. The rate coefficients for these reactions are estimated from monomer concentrations, polymer molecular weights, and NMR analyses of quaternary branch points and macromer end groups for a series of semibatch experiments with varying monomer and polymer concentrations. A classical free radical polymerization model is insufficient for the description of this complex system. Thus, a mechanistic model including the additional reactions has been formulated and is shown to provide a good representation of the experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations137
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207