Dimensionless numbers for tundish modelling and the Guthrie number ( <i>Gu</i> )
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modelling the transport phenomena in tundishes has been a vast area of research for the last three decades. Many papers have been published and are available in the literature on this subject. The basics of modelling involve a similarity criterion between the model and the full scale prototype and are well documented in major textbooks. However, the similarity criteria are different for different cases. For example, for fluid flow in a tundish, the Re and Fr similarity is considered, whereas for heat transfer, the Pr and Pe number similarity should be considered. Numerous other examples can be cited. It is really important to know which similarity criteria should be used for a particular case. In this paper, a new dimensionless number Gu has been proposed when dealing with the modelling of inclusions separating out in a tundish. All dimensionless numbers can be represented as a ratio of two characteristic time scales, and this fact is highlighted in the present paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it