Overview of Recent Research Activities of Monte Carlo Simulation in Japan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes recent progresses of the Monte Carlo simulation technology in nuclear energy field in Japan. Radiation shielding solution method using the Monte Carlo had been validated as a reliable tool through the discussion of “Radiation Shielding Safety Demonstration Analysis Group” of Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute. Since 1996, “Monte Carlo Simulation Working Group” has been accumulating use experiences of Monte Carlo codes in the wide range of nuclear energy field. This working group is planing to publish “Guideline of Monte Carlo Simulations” during FY-99. This “Guideline” is expected to be a first Japanese practical textbook of Monte Carlo calculation. In 1998, the first full-scale topical conference on Monte Carlo simulation was held in Tokyo. “Research Committee on Particle Simulation with the Monte Carlo Method” was established in Atomic Energy Society of Japan in 1998. This committee is composed of more than seventy members from many fields of nuclear energy research in Japan. This committee is expected to be a core that will drive the research and development activity of Monte Carlo calculation in Japan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it