MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053903066 · doi:10.1076/stra.9.4.231.697

Abduction paralysis with hypotropia: Sign of weakness of a contralateral superior oblique

2001· article· en· W2053903066 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStrabismus · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParesisParalysisMedicineEye movementTrochlear nerveSurgeryFixation (population genetics)WeaknessCranial nervesSuperior oblique muscleExtraocular musclesAbducens nerveDiplopiaOblique casePalsyOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

background The clinical diagnosis of extraocular motor paralysis that is caused by severe cranial trauma can often be complicated. The resulting clinical picture can make the identification of all the components of potentially treatable oculomotor problems difficult. methods We examined five cases of complete abducens nerve paralysis with marked downshoot in attempted abduction seen after severe cranial trauma. results With the patients looking in the field of gaze of the paralysis, a marked infraductive movement of the paralytic eye occurred while the other eye maintained fixation. Other clinical findings confirmed this to be a secondary deviation due to a paresis of the contralateral superior oblique. conclusion Patients with a paralysis of the lateral rectus following a severe cranial trauma who demonstrate a marked downshoot of the involved eye should be suspected of having a paresis of the contralateral superior oblique. This diagnosis has helped us effectively to treat this vertical incomitance by a simple weakening procedure of the contralateral inferior oblique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it