MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053920929 · doi:10.1080/13895260500128914

A stochastic optimization approach to mine truck allocation

2005· article· en· W2053920929 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surface Mining Reclamation and Environment · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaSyncrude (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckProcess (computing)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationStochastic modellingKey (lock)Stochastic programmingStochastic processStochastic optimizationOperations researchEngineeringMathematicsAutomotive engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the mining industry, truck assignment is an important and complex process and an optimal truck allocation can result in significant savings. In this paper, a truck allocation model is formulated using a chance-constrained, stochastic optimization approach that can accommodate uncertain parameters such as truckload and cycle time. A real-time hauling framework, which consists of the chance-constrained optimization model and a model updater, is developed to compensate for changes in the uncertain key operating parameters. The use of the model updater helps the truck allocation system to adapt to random operational changes. The effectiveness of the chance-constrained approach in dealing with uncertain process parameters, when coupled with model updating, is shown to be a viable implementation framework in the dispatching operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it