MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053920929 · doi:10.1080/13895260500128914

A stochastic optimization approach to mine truck allocation

2005· article· en· W2053920929 on OpenAlexaff
Chung Huu. Ta, J. V. Kresta, J. Fraser Forbes, Horacio J. Marquez

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surface Mining Reclamation and Environment · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaSyncrude (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckProcess (computing)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationStochastic modellingKey (lock)Stochastic programmingStochastic processStochastic optimizationOperations researchEngineeringMathematicsAutomotive engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the mining industry, truck assignment is an important and complex process and an optimal truck allocation can result in significant savings. In this paper, a truck allocation model is formulated using a chance-constrained, stochastic optimization approach that can accommodate uncertain parameters such as truckload and cycle time. A real-time hauling framework, which consists of the chance-constrained optimization model and a model updater, is developed to compensate for changes in the uncertain key operating parameters. The use of the model updater helps the truck allocation system to adapt to random operational changes. The effectiveness of the chance-constrained approach in dealing with uncertain process parameters, when coupled with model updating, is shown to be a viable implementation framework in the dispatching operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Surface Mining Reclamation and EnvironmentSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207