Amine Oxidase Inhibitors and Development of Neuroprotective Drugs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors continue to be used for treatment of a number of psychiatric and neurologic disorders. In recent years, inhibitors of MAO and other amine oxidases have received considerable attention because of their neuroprotective and neurorescue effects in such models as oxygen-glucose deprivation in vitro, thiamine deficiency, NMDA-instigated excitotoxicity, free radical-mediated oxidative stress, cerebral ischemia, and experimental models of Alzheimers and Parkinsons Diseases. This review focuses on the MAO inhibitors l-deprenyl, tranylcypromine and phenelzine and the possible mechanisms underlying their neuroprotective actions. In addition, there is a discussion of analogs of phenelzine and l-deprenyl as inhibitors of other amine oxidases, including semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (SSAO), and their possible involvement in neuroprotection. Keywords: neuroprotection, neurorescue, l-deprenyl, amine oxidase, semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase, phenelzine, phenylethylidenehydrazine
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".