Problematic Hypersexuality: A Review of Conceptualization and Diagnosis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been considerable debate regarding the conceptualization and diagnosis of individuals exhibiting problematic hypersexuality. Various terms such as sexual addiction, sexual compulsivity, and sexual impulsivity have been applied based predominantly on the perceived psychopathological mechanisms guiding the behavior. Unfortunately, such descriptive diversity has inhibited adequate conceptualization and current diagnostic practices, which in turn, have negatively impacted treatment design. This paper critically reviews the extant literature regarding the conceptualization and diagnosis of problematic hypersexuality. Additionally, this review highlights the utility of a relatively new conceptualization of problematic hypersexuality, the Sexual Desire Disorders model, which accounts for many of the limitations inherent in previous explanatory models. Finally, diagnostic, conceptual, and treatment implications are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it