MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054363716 · doi:10.2989/16073606.2011.594227

On the sheaf characterization of Gelfand rings

2011· article· en· W2054363716 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaestiones Mathematicae · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSheafPure mathematicsAxiomCharacterization (materials science)Hausdorff spaceCommutative ringCommutative propertyType (biology)Algebra over a fieldGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the commutative rings with unit in which a+b = 1 implies that (1+ar)(1+bs) = 0 for suitable r and s. These rings have been considered, alternatively, in terms of conditions on their maximal ideals (DeMarco-Orsatti 1971, Mulvey 1979, Johnstone 1982) which are equivalent to the above in the presence of the Axiom of Choice (Banaschewski 2000). The purpose here is to give new characterizations of these rings as the rings of global elements of certain sheaves of rings on compact regular frames, the pointfree counterparts of compact Hausdorff spaces, augmenting a previous result of this type (Banaschewski 2000). In particular, one of the present cases provides the exact pointfree version of (the commutative case of) the original characerization of these rings of Mulvey (1979) which the earlier work did not achieve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it