MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054882253 · doi:10.1086/378214

Variability in the Astronomical Refraction of the Rising and Setting Sun

2003· article· en· W2054882253 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Wave Propagation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractionSunsetSunriseStandard deviationAtmospheric refractionGeodesyGeologyRange (aeronautics)Variation (astronomy)PhysicsMeteorologyOpticsAtmospheric sciencesAstronomyRemote sensingMathematicsMaterials scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Observed timings of 244 sunrises and 135 sunsets from two closely spaced geographic locations in Edmonton, Alberta, were used to determine astronomical refraction for the Sun's upper limb. The observed astronomical refraction had a mean of 0 669, a standard deviation of 0 175, and a range between 0 402 and 2 081. At sunrise, the astronomical refraction had a mean of 0 714, a standard deviation of 0 184, and a range between 0 402 and 2 081. At sunset, the astronomical refraction had a mean of 0 579, a standard deviation of 0 108, and a range between 0 442 and 1 085. There is a strong annual variation of the monthly mean and the monthly standard deviation of the astronomical refraction. Both parameters reach a maximum during the coldest months for sunrises and sunsets. Abnormally large refraction events—sometimes called Novaya Zemlya solar mirages—can occur in both warm and cold months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it