Synthesis, solubilities, and cyclic capacities of amino alcohols for CO2 capture from flue gas streams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amines that have been widely used in post combustion CO2 capture processes are monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA) and N-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA). If used individually, these solvents have their limitations, and efforts to resolve these have produced formulated solvents consisting of blends of amines and some chemical additives. The advantages derivable from amine blends are also limited to commercially available individual amines. It is therefore desirable to synthesize new amines or amino alcohols that could incorporate the advantages of amine blends in the same molecule or provide new materials for blending in a formulated solvent. Recently, such amino alcohols have been synthesized based on an approach of rational molecular design and synthesis. This involved a systematic modification of the structure of amino alcohols by an appropriate placement of substituent functional groups, especially the hydroxyl function, relative to the position of the amino group. Some of the resulting amino alcohols were 4-(diethylamino)-2-butanol (Reg 1); 4-(piperidino)-2-butanol (Reg 2); 4- propylamino-2-butanol (Reg 3) and 4-(ethyl-methyl-amino)-2-butanol (Reg 4). The performance of these amino alcohols in aqueous solutions in terms of solubility of CO2 and cyclic capacity were compared with those of aqueous MEA using tests conducted at temperatures of 40, 60 and 80 ∘C at CO2 partial pressures of 15 and 100 kPa. All the listed amino alcohols provided a much higher CO2 absorption capacity than MEA with Reg 3 showing the highest absorption capacities at all the temperature considered. The cyclic capacity (derived as the difference between the solubilities at 40 and 80 ∘C) of the listed solvents were also much higher than that for MEA with Reg 4 showing the highest cyclic capacity. These characteristics result in a much higher CO2 absorption and a much less energy consumption for absorbent regeneration, such as in CO2 stripping, compared to conventional amines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".