MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055348776 · doi:10.4296/cwrj3404393

Review of Water Chemistry Research in Natural and Disturbed Peatlands

2009· article· en· W2055348776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatBogEnvironmental scienceNatural (archaeology)EcologyWater chemistryAtmosphere (unit)Hydrology (agriculture)Earth scienceEnvironmental chemistryPhysical geographyGeographyChemistryEnvironmental engineeringGeologyBiologyArchaeologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The chemical components in water, and changes thereof, can control the ecology of peatlands and impact the accumulation of peat; while at the same time ecological characteristics, hydrology and interactions with the atmosphere and geosphere control peatland water chemistry. This review summarizes results from Canadian and northern European research published over the past two decades for major and minor, inorganic and organic constituents dissolved in surface or pore waters associated with bogs and fens. First those studies that describe natural peatlands are discussed, followed by those that involve peatlands that are disturbed by various direct or indirect anthropogenic influences. Finally several recommendations are made regarding future studies and how they can assist in modelling efforts that can inform peatland management and further scientific inquiry. Les composantes chimiques de l'eau, et les changements qui en découlent, peuvent contrôler l'écologie des tourbières et influer sur l'accumulation de la tourbe; parallèlement les caractéristiques écologiques, l'hydrologie et les interactions avec l'atmosphère et la géosphère contrôlent l'hydrochimie de la tourbière. Cette étude résume les résultats tirés de recherches menées au Canada et en Europe du Nord et publiées au cours des deux dernières décennies à l'égard des composés inorganiques et organiques, majeurs et mineurs, dissous dans les eaux interstitielles ou de surface associées aux tourbières et aux marais. Sont d'abord traitées les études qui décrivent les tourbières naturelles, suivies de celles qui portent sur les tourbières perturbées par diverses influences anthropiques directes ou indirectes. Enfin, plusieurs recommandations sont formulées à l'égard de futures études et de la façon dont elles pourraient contribuer aux efforts de modélisation pouvant éclairer la gestion des tourbières et les futures recherches scientifiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it