MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055348776 · doi:10.4296/cwrj3404393

Review of Water Chemistry Research in Natural and Disturbed Peatlands

2009· article· en· W2055348776 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Richard A. Bourbonniere

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatBogEnvironmental scienceNatural (archaeology)EcologyWater chemistryAtmosphere (unit)Hydrology (agriculture)Earth scienceEnvironmental chemistryPhysical geographyGeographyChemistryEnvironmental engineeringGeologyBiologyArchaeologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chemical components in water, and changes thereof, can control the ecology of peatlands and impact the accumulation of peat; while at the same time ecological characteristics, hydrology and interactions with the atmosphere and geosphere control peatland water chemistry. This review summarizes results from Canadian and northern European research published over the past two decades for major and minor, inorganic and organic constituents dissolved in surface or pore waters associated with bogs and fens. First those studies that describe natural peatlands are discussed, followed by those that involve peatlands that are disturbed by various direct or indirect anthropogenic influences. Finally several recommendations are made regarding future studies and how they can assist in modelling efforts that can inform peatland management and further scientific inquiry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207