MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055431961 · doi:10.2118/157804-ms

Field Scale Simulation of Cyclic Solvent Injection (CSI)

2012· article· en· W2055431961 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsAlberta Innovates
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWormholeSolventSolubilityPetroleum engineeringPetroleumPermeability (electromagnetism)Oil fieldMass transferProcess engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceChemistryMaterials scienceGeologyEngineeringChromatographyPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Only 5 – 10% of the oil in Lloydminster heavy oil reservoirs is recovered during cold production with sand (CHOPS). Cyclic solvent injection (CSI) is the most promising post-CHOPS follow-up process. In CSI, a solvent mixture (e.g. methane-propane) is injected and allowed to soak into the reservoir before production begins (Figure 1). CSI has been focused on heavy oil recovery from post-CHOPS reservoirs that are too thin for an economic steam-based process. It has been piloted by NEXEN and by Husky and was a fundamental part of the $40 million Joint Implementation of Vapour Extraction (JIVE) solvent pilot program that ran from 2006–2010. This paper describes field scale simulations of CSI performed with a comprehensive numerical model that uses "mass transfer" rate equations to represent non-equilibrium solvent solubility behaviour i.e. there is a delay before the solvent reaches its equilibrium solubility in oil. The model contains mechanisms to consider foaming or to ignore it depending on the field behaviour. It has been used to match laboratory experiments, design CSI operating strategies, and to interpret CSI field pilot results. The paper summarizes the impact on simulation predictions of post-CHOPS reservoir characterizations where the wormhole region was represented by one of the following five configurations: (1) an effective high permeability zone, (2) a dual permeability zone, (3) a dilated zone around the well, (4) wormholes (20 cm diameter spokes) extending from the well without branching, (5) wormholes extending from the well with branching from the main wormholes,. The different post-CHOPS configurations lead to dramatically different reservoir access for solvent and to different predictions of CSI performance. The impacts of grid size, upscaling, well inflow parameter, solvent dissolution and exsolution rate constants, and injection strategy were examined. The assumption of instant equilibrium solubility resulted in a 23% reduction in oil production compared to when a delay in solvent dissolution and exsolution was allowed for. Increasing the grid block size by a factor of 9 reduced the predicted oil production five-fold. Assuming isothermal behaviour in the simulations decreased predicted oil production by 17%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it