MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055473431 · doi:10.1093/europace/euu413

Transseptal puncture from the jugular vein and balloon cryoablation for atrial fibrillation in a patient with azygos continuation of an interrupted inferior vena cava

2015· article· en· W2055473431 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular anomalies and interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCryoablationAzygos veinSuperior vena cavaAtrial fibrillationJugular veinBalloonCardiologySurgeryAblation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Inferior vena cava (IVC) interruption is a rare anatomic variant where the azygos vein (AV) drains the blood from the IVC to the upper part of the right atrium via the superior vena cava. Here, we report balloon cryoablation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) via superior access in a patient with atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: After the first failed ablation attempt due to IVC interruption, balloon cryoablation with a 28-mm Arctic Front Advance cryoballoon (Medtronic CryoCath LP, Quebec, Canada) via superior access was performed; it requires only a single transseptal puncture (TP), and the patient had optimal PV anatomy. Deflectable electrodes were inserted into the right ventricle and coronary sinus from the right femoral vein. The right internal jugular vein was accessed using an SL0 transseptal sheath and BRK needle. The TP was performed under transoesophageal echocardiographic guidance with a Safe Sept wire because the septum was stiff. All PVs were engaged: the left using an ablation catheter before balloon insertion and the inferior following a 'push-up' technique because of a leak above the veins. Cryothermal energy was delivered after checking for occlusion. The procedure lasted 210 min, fluoroscopy time was 78 min, and air-kerma dose was 194 mGy. During the 6-month follow-up, no episodes of atrial fibrillation were detected on several Holter recordings. CONCLUSIONS: Successful PV isolation in patients with AV continuation of an interrupted IVC can be safely performed using superior access with balloon cryoablation, after several modifications of standard equipment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it