MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical simulation of rheological effects in fiber spinning

2000· article· en· W2055486893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Polymer Technology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDie swellMaterials scienceExtensional viscosityRheologyViscoelasticityComposite materialConstitutive equationSpinningFiberIsothermal processPolymerPolypropyleneMelt spinningThermodynamicsExtrusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fiber-spinning process is an important industrial operation to manufacture synthetic fibers. The process occurs under free-surface conditions, and the final properties of the fiber are characterized by the extensional properties of the polymer. Specifically, the non-isothermal response of the polymer in uniaxial extension dominates the process. The fiber-spinning process is analyzed by means of a unidirectional approach because the thickness of the fiber is very small with respect to its lateral dimension. The analysis accounts for the prehistory of the material inside the die, based on purely extensional strains. For viscoelastic polymer melts, the constitutive equation must be able to describe adequately the rheological behavior of the polymer in extensional flow. A good candidate for such modeling is the K-BKZ integral constitutive equation, with a spectrum of relaxation times, which captures well the nonlinear viscoelastic response of polymer melts. The non-isothermal response is taken into account with a temperature shift factor utilizing the Morland-Lee hypothesis. The present work includes effects due to gravity, inertia, and air drag, where applicable. Simulation results are compared with experiments on polypropylene (PP), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) melts at low and high speeds. Results are also compared with previous simulations. It is shown that in some cases the extrudate swell at the spinneret exit must be taken into account to accurately predict the drawing forces, which makes a fully two-dimensional analysis a necessity for such operations. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Adv Polym Techn 19: 155–172, 2000

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it