Behavioral Therapy and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in the Treatment of Infantile Insensible Urinary Incontinence: a Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of behavioral therapy and pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of a 5 year-old female child presenting insensible urinary incontinence (IUI) symptoms. [Subjects and Methods] Outcome measures included a voiding diary to quantify symptoms and urinary frequency, and surface electromyography was measured at the beginning and end of the treatment. Behavioral therapy included the provision of information regarding hygiene habits, voiding position, the anatomical and physiological basis of urinary incontinence, and bladder training using a voiding diary on a specified schedule. Pelvic floor muscle training was performed in different positions using sets of sustained and fast contractions. The child received training in a total of 25 sessions. [Results] The child showed improvement of symptoms according to the voiding diary and electromyographic values. [Conclusion] Behavior therapy and pelvic floor muscle training following to our protocol may have improved the symptoms of IUI in this child.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".