MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055612816 · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1209

Cytokine and acute phase protein gene expression in repeated liver biopsies of dairy cows with a lipopolysaccharide-induced mastitis

2009· article· en· W2055612816 on OpenAlexfundno aff
L. Vels, Christine M Røntved, Morten Bjerring, K.L. Ingvartsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of SaskatchewanAarhus UniversitetAbbott Laboratories
KeywordsAcute-phase proteinHaptoglobinSerum amyloid ALipopolysaccharideMastitisInternal medicineMedicineLipopolysaccharide binding proteinEndocrinologyLiver biopsyTumor necrosis factor alphaCytokineWhite blood cellLeukocytosisSomatic cell countImmunologyLactationBiologyBiopsyInflammationPathologyIce calvingPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A minimally invasive liver biopsy technique was tested for its applicability to study the hepatic acute phase response (APR) in dairy cows with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced mastitis. The hepatic mRNA expression profiles of the inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), IL-1beta, IL-6, and IL-10, and the acute phase proteins serum amyloid A isoform 3 (SAA3), haptoglobin (Hp), and alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein (AGP) were determined by real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Fourteen primiparous cows in mid lactation were challenged with 200 microg of LPS (n = 8) or NaCl solution (n = 6) in 1 front quarter. Six repeated liver biopsies were collected at -22, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 48 h relative to LPS challenge in 4 LPS-infused cows and 3 NaCl-infused cows. The remaining cows had 3 liver biopsies taken at -22, 9, and 48 h. Production data and clinical signs were recorded and white blood cell counts and somatic cell counts (SCC) were analyzed to investigate the effect of repeated liver biopsies and verify the LPS model. Plasma concentrations of TNF-alpha, SAA3, Hp, and AGP were determined for comparison with the liver expression data. Repeated liver biopsies had no effects on the production data, clinical signs, or APR of dairy cows. Compared with the NaCl-infused cows the LPS-infused cows responded to the LPS treatment by increased body temperature (38.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 39.4 +/- 0.1 degrees C), short-term leukopenia followed by leukocytosis (6.44 +/- 0.4 vs. 5.69 +/- 0.3 x 10(6) cells/mL), an increased SCC (log(10) 2.1 +/- 0.1 vs. log(10) 2.8 +/- 0.1 x 10(3) cells/mL), heart rate (76 +/- 1 vs. 93 +/- 1 beats/min), and respiratory rate (32 +/- 2 vs. 36 +/- 1 breaths/min) in the acute phase of the disease. The LPS treatment upregulated the hepatic expression of TNF-alpha (103 +/- 24 vs. 255 +/- 18 units), IL-1beta (37 +/- 23 vs. 296 +/- 18 units), IL-6 (8 +/- 17 vs. 122 +/- 12 units), and IL-10 (130 +/- 66 vs. 541 +/- 50 units), and SAA3 (64 +/- 36 vs. 128 +/- 28 units) and Hp (9 +/- 82 vs. 762 +/- 65 units) reaching maximum levels at 3 to 6 h and 9 to 12 h postinfusion, respectively. Plasma concentrations of TNF-alpha (nondetectable vs. 1.9 +/- 0.3 ng/mL), SAA (19.8 +/- 19.4 vs. 149.7 +/- 15.5 microg/mL) and Hp (71.4 +/- 143.7 vs. 1,013.8 +/- 111.5 microg/mL) were elevated in the LPS-infused cows at 4 to 12 h, 8 to 120 h, and 24 to 120 h postinfusion, respectively. The hepatic expression of AGP and the AGP plasma concentration remained unaltered in LPS-induced cows. In conclusion, a minimally invasive liver biopsy technique can be used for studying the hepatic APR in diseased cattle. Lipopolysaccharide-induced mastitis resulted in a time-dependent production of inflammatory cytokines and SAA and Hp in the liver of dairy cows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations133
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicAnimal health and immunologyFrench-language works237,207