MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055808783 · doi:10.1159/000124150

Serum Melatonin Response to Melatonin Administration in the Syrian Hamster

2008· article· en· W2055808783 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory M. Brown, Jo Seggie, Lee J. Grota

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMelatoninMorningEndocrinologyHamsterInternal medicineCircadian rhythmBasal (medicine)MesocricetusReproductionBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic daily administration of melatonin (MT) can have potent effects on reproduction in the hamster. Various theories have been elaborated to explain these effects but little information has been available on circulating levels of MT following MT administration. We have examined the serum MT response in the male hamster to a single dose of 25 micrograms MT administered in the morning or in the afternoon--the same timing and dose used by others to produce reproductive effects. With both morning and afternoon administration, serum MT increased above 1,000 pg/ml and remained above the highest basal levels during most of the 24-hour cycle. These levels are clearly supraphysiologic ones. The decline in serum MT showed two distinct components following morning administration. Half-life of the initial component which probably represents rapid distribution into tissues was 17.3 min. A half-life of 25.1 h was calculated for the second component. We conclude that use of a 25-micrograms dose of melatonin to study pineal effects may be misleading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicCircadian rhythm and melatoninFrench-language works237,207