MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056012330 · doi:10.1002/mop.23509

MIMO handheld antenna design approach using characteristic mode concepts

2008· article· en· W2056012330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyNational Science Council
KeywordsMIMOMobile deviceMicrowaveElectronic engineeringAntenna (radio)Mode (computer interface)EngineeringEnvelope (radar)Conformal antennaReconfigurable antennaElectrical engineeringDirectional antenna3G MIMOComputer scienceOmnidirectional antennaTelecommunicationsSlot antennaAntenna efficiencyRadarBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In handheld communications devices there is not much room for the placement of antennas. This problem is exacerbated when more than one antenna is needed for use in a MIMO communications system. It is then useful to be able to utilize some of the existing device structure to form the required antennas. In this article, we show how the characteristic mode theory can be used to achieve this in a way that results in antennas with the low envelope correlation preferred for MIMO antennas. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 50: 1724–1727, 2008; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.23509

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it