MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056167539 · doi:10.2514/1.34810

Parallel Newton-Krylov Solver for the Euler equations Discretized Using Simultaneous Approximation Terms

2008· article· en· W2056167539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationSolverBackward Euler methodEuler's formulaApplied mathematicsEuler equationsMathematicsSemi-implicit Euler methodEuler methodNewton's methodMathematical analysisComputer sciencePhysicsMathematical optimizationNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

0mesh continuity at block interfaces, accommodates arbitrary block topologies, and has low interblock-communication overhead. The resulting discrete equations are solved iteratively using an inexact-Newton method. At each Newton iteration, the linear system is solved inexactly using a Krylov-subspace iterative method, and both additive Schwarz and approximate Schur preconditioners are investigated. The algorithm is tested on the ONERA M6 wing geometry. We conclude that the approximate Schur preconditioner is an efficient alternative to the Schwarz preconditioner. Overall, the results demonstrate that the Newton–Krylov algorithm is very efficient: using 24 processors, a transonic flow on a 96-block, 1-million-node mesh requires 12 minutes for a 10-order reduction of the residual norm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it