MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056308966 · doi:10.1002/mus.1042

The motor cortex and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

2001· review· en· W2056308966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscle & Nerve · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisNeuroscienceExcitotoxicityAnterior Horn CellDegeneration (medical)Motor cortexPrimary motor cortexPyramidal tractsAnatomyBiologyMedicinePathologyGlutamate receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On theoretical grounds, abnormalities of the motor cortex in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) could lead to anterograde ("dying-forward") transneuronal degeneration of the anterior horn cells as suggested by Charcot. Conversely, retrograde ("dying-back") degeneration of the corticospinal tracts could affect the motor cortex. Evidence derived from clinical, neuropathological, static, and functional imaging, and physiological studies, favors the occurrence of anterograde degeneration. It is hypothesized that transneuronal degeneration in ALS is an active excitotoxic process in which live but dysfunctional corticomotoneurons, originating in the primary motor cortex, drive the anterior horn cell into metabolic deficit. When this is marked, it will result in more rapid and widespread loss of lower motor neurons. In contrast, slow loss of corticomotoneurons, as occurs in primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), precludes excitotoxic drive and is incompatible with anterograde degeneration. Preservation of slow-conducting non-M1 direct pathways in PLS is not associated with excitotoxicity, and anterior horn cells survive for long periods of time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it