MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056356212 · doi:10.5339/qfarf.2013.sshp-012

Training model to develop the Qatar workforce using emerging learning technologies

2013· article· en· W2056356212 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueQatar Foundation Annual Research Forum Volume 2013 Issue 1 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceFlexibility (engineering)Presentation (obstetrics)EngineeringEngineering managementKnowledge managementBusinessComputer scienceManagementEconomic growthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Qatar National Vision aims at “transforming Qatar into an advanced country by 2030, capable of sustaining its own development and providing for a high standard of living for all of its people for generations to come”. The grand challenge of Human Capacity Development aims to develop sustainable talent for Qatar's knowledge economy in order to meet the needs for a high-quality workforce. In order for Qatar to achieve its 2030 National Vision and become an advanced country by 2030, it has to train its citizens to function in a globalized and competitive world. Important skills for Qatari to function in the 21st century are communication and use of emerging technologies skills. This presentation will propose a training model to develop the Qatar workforce for the 21st century using emerging learning technologies. The training model was based on a mobile learning research project funded by the Qatar Foundation through the Qatar National Research Fund. The project is a collaborative research project with Qatar University, Qatar Petroleum, Qatar Wireless Innovation Centre, and Athabasca University, Canada. The project developed and implemented training lessons on Communication Skills for the oil and gas industry using mobile technology to deliver the training. The workers were employed at Qatar Petroleum and completed the training as part of their professional development to improve their English communication skills. Results from the project showed that workers performance improved after they completed the training and they reported that use of mobile technology to deliver the training provides flexibility for learning on the job. They suggested that the training should be more interactive and game-like. This is important since today's young workers are comfortable using mobile technologies and they need to be motivated to learn using the mobile technologies. The proposed Qatar National Training Model (QNTM) (Figure 1) is based on the mobile learning research project funded by the Qatar Foundation through the Qatar National Research Fund. In the QNTM, the learner/trainee/worker is at the center of the learning since the goal of training is to provide the knowledge and skills to improve workers' performance on the job. The design of the training must follow good learning design principles including preparing the learner for the training, providing activities for the learners to complete to improve their knowledge and skills, allowing learners to practice to improve their performance, certifying learners based on their performance, and providing opportunities for learners to transfer what they learn to the job environment. The delivery of the training should be flexible using a blended approach that includes face-to-face, hands-on, E-learning, mobile learning, and online learning. A variety of learning strategies such as practice with feedback, tutorials, simulations, games, and problem solving can be used depending on the learning outcomes to be achieved. The proposed Qatar National Training Model will allow for learner-centered training, lifelong learning, just-in-time learning, learning in context, developing skills required for 21st century learning, and interaction between learners and between learners and the trainer using social media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it