MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056511318 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2014.2298033

A 160 GHz Pulsed Radar Transceiver in 65 nm CMOS

2014· article· en· W2056511318 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConcordia University
KeywordsTransceiverCMOSElectrical engineeringBasebandBandwidth (computing)TransmitterChipPhased arrayCenter frequencyNoise figureRadarMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringAmplifierEngineeringTelecommunicationsBand-pass filterAntenna (radio)Channel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a 160 GHz center frequency pulsed 65 nm CMOS transceiver for short range radar applications. Four phased array transceivers were implemented in a single chip with antennas implemented in a BGA package. The implemented transmitter is capable of producing pulses of 100 ps widths ( >20 GHz RF bandwidth) at a 160 GHz carrier frequency. The measured effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) is 18.8 dBm for continuous wave outputs. The analog beam forming receiver achieves an overall gain of 42.5 dB, -14 dBm IP1dB, 7 GHz bandwidth, and a noise figure of 22.5 dB. The sliding window time-dilation baseband relaxes the output data rate and subsequent digital processing requirements. Fine grained duty cycling reduces power dissipation. The entire chip consumes 2.2 W from 1.2/1.4 V supplies in a 65 nm digital CMOS process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it