MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056703989 · doi:10.1080/07055900.2001.9649665

The influence of snow cover on northern hemisphere climate variability

2001· article· en· W2056703989 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Judah Cohen, Dara Entekhabi

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNorthern HemisphereSnow coverClimatologySnowForcing (mathematics)Middle latitudesPhysical geographyEnvironmental scienceGeographyGeologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The importance of snow cover anomalies on the local energy balance is well known, however, the potential impact of snow cover anomalies on local and remote atmospheric dynamics is less understood. We present observational evidence demonstrating a statistically significant relationship between seasonal snow cover and winter‐time circulation anomalies over mid‐high latitudes. To explore snow forcing further, a General Circulation Model is used to test whether the local diabatic changes caused by snow cover can induce large‐scale dynamical responses. A six‐member ensemble, three winter month (DJF) integration is performed for a control case and a case where snow cover is increased as observed during the positive‐anomalous winter of 1977/1978. Snow cover variability results in altered general circulation patterns resembling observed anomaly patterns at mid‐high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere winter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations127
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207