MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Uncovering the sexual self in people with schizophrenia

2007· article· en· W2056879521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityPsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Context (archaeology)Construct (python library)Psychology of selfGrounded theoryClinical psychologyQualitative researchDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatrySocial psychologyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sexuality is a vital component of the self. Yet, there is a dearth of research literature that explores the sexuality of people with schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to understand how people with schizophrenia experience and perceive their sexuality. Using grounded theory methodology, the study recruited five men and five women with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders who lived independently in the community. These participants were interviewed regarding their subjective sense of their own sexuality. The findings suggested that people with schizophrenia integrate sexuality into their sense of self. Although the illness affected various aspects of their sexual lives, many participants were able to develop and maintain meaningful intimate relationships, as well as construct their own definitions and personal meanings of sexuality. Furthermore, participants described dealing with the impact of schizophrenia in the context of managing their illness. These findings have implications for clinical practice and recovery of people with schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it