Discover Gene Specific Local Co-regulations Using Progressive Genetic Algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of gene specific co-regulation discovery is that, for a particular gene of interest, identify its closely coregulated genes and the associated subsets of experimental conditions in which such co-regulations occur. The coregulations are local in the sense that they occur in some subsets of full experimental conditions. In this paper, we propose an innovative method for finding gene specific coregulations using genetic algorithm (GA). Two novel ad hoc GAs, the single-stage and two-stage progressive GA, are proposed. They are called progressive because the initial population for the GA in a window position inherits the top-ranked individuals obtained in the preceding window position, enabling them to achieve better accuracy than the nonprogressive algorithm. Experimental results with real-life gene expression data demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our technique in discovering gene specific coregulations
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it