La géographie de Paul Vidal de la Blache face au litige guyanais : la science à l'épreuve de la justice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article analyse un ouvrage très peu commenté du géographe français Paul Vidal de la Blache (1845-1918) : La rivière Vincent Pinzon. Étude de la cartographie de la Guyane . Ce livre, publié en 1902, expose une partie importante de la preuve déposée en 1899 par la France devant le Conseil fédéral suisse qui devait trancher le litige entre la France et le Brésil relativement à leur frontière commune en Guyane. L’argumentation de cette partie de la preuve, à caractère cartographique, avait été confiée à Vidal de la Blache, qui jugea par la suite utile de la publier sous forme de monographie. L’ouvrage témoigne d’une tension sourde mais non moins vive entre la ferveur patriotique et l’engagement scientiste. Vidal y expose également une conception tronquée de la science et de la justice qui, au plan épistémologique, limite grandement la portée de son analyse géographique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".