MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057188495 · doi:10.2118/126339-pa

Support-Vector Regression for Permeability Prediction in a Heterogeneous Reservoir: A Comparative Study

2010· article· en· W2057188495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural risk minimizationSupport vector machineStatistical learning theoryArtificial neural networkPetrophysicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceLeast squares support vector machineReservoir modelingMachine learningNonlinear systemMinificationGeneralizationPermeability (electromagnetism)Reservoir simulationRegressionComputationMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringStatisticsPetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Permeability is a key parameter in reservoir-engineering computation, and the relationship between rock petrophysical properties and permeability is often complex and difficult to understand by using conventional statistical methods. Neural-network-based methods can be employed to develop more-accurate permeability correlations, but the correlations from these methods have limited generalizability and the global correlations are usually less accurate compared to local correlations. In this research, the objective is to build a permeability model with promising generalization performance. Recently, support-vector machines (SVMs) based on statistical-learning theory have been proposed as a new intelligence technique for both prediction and classification tasks. The formulation of SVMs embodies the structural-risk-minimization (SRM) principle, which has been shown to be superior to the traditional empirical-risk-minimization (ERM) principle employed by conventional neural networks. This new formulation deals with kernel functions, allows projection to higher planes, and solves more-complex nonlinear problems. SRM minimizes an upper bound on the expected risk, as opposed to ERM, which minimizes the error on the training data. It is this difference that equips SVMs with a greater ability to generalize, which is the goal in reservoir-characterization statistical learning. This novel support-vector-regression (SVR) algorithm was first introduced in well-logs intelligent analysis. Here, a permeability-prediction model using SVR from well logs in a heterogeneous sandstone reservoir is developed. Also, an attempt has been made to review the basic ideas underlying support-vector machines for function estimation. To demonstrate the potential of the proposed SVM's regression technique in prediction permeability, a study was performed to compare its performance with multilayer perceptron neural network, generalized neural network, and radial-basis-function neural networks. Accuracy and robustness were investigated, and statistical-error analysis reveals that the SVM approach is superior to the other methods for generalizing previously unseen permeability data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it