MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057473474 · doi:10.7202/016484ar

Prendre soin en contexte d’immigration récente. Les limites aux solidarités familiales à l’égard des membres de la famille avec incapacités1

2007· article· fr· W2057473474 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfances Familles Générations · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Identity, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMcGill UniversityCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Cavendish
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plusieurs recherches ont porté sur les solidarités à l’égard des proches avec incapacités chez les familles de minorités ethnoculturelles. Ces recherches ont permis de constater une grande valorisation des solidarités familiales, une prestation importante de soins et un faible recours aux services chez ces familles. Toutefois, la plupart des recherches ont porté soit sur des groupes d’immigration ancienne, soit sur des groupes mixtes, ce qui ne permet pas de saisir les dynamiques chez les familles d’immigration récente. La présente étude porte sur 15 familles d’immigration récente prenant soin d’un proche avec incapacités. De l’analyse des entretiens, il ressort qu’il n’existe pas une seule norme univoque de solidarité familiale et que les familles connaissent de nombreuses contraintes qui limitent la capacité et la volonté des familles de prendre soin de ses membres avec incapacités.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it