MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057559484 · doi:10.1139/b00-072

Microhabitat distribution of protostelids in temperate habitats in northwestern Arkansas

2000· article· en· W2057559484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSlime Mold and Myxomycetes Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabitatPlant litterEcologyBiologyLitterTemperate climateKey (lock)Ecosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protostelids are unicellular slime molds that belong in a monophyletic group, the Eumycetozoa. A standardized technique was developed for the study of protostelid communities from the leaf litter and aerial microhabitats of forests and grasslands in northwestern Arkansas. Protostelium mycophaga Olive and Stoian and Soliformovum irregularis (Olive and Stoian) Spiegel were more abundant in grasslands, while Schizoplasmodiopsis pseudoendospora Olive, Martin, and Stoian, Nematostelium ovatum (Olive and Stoian) Olive and Stoian, and Echinosteliopsis oligospora Reinhard and Olive were more abundant in forests. Some species of protostelids exhibited a preference for either the aerial microhabitat, e.g., P. mycophaga and Soliformovum irregularis, or the litter microhabitat, e.g., N. ovatum and Schizoplasmodiopsis pseudoendospora. Other species, including Cavostelium apophysatum Olive, Tychosporium arachisporum Spiegel, Moore, and Feldman, and Schizoplasmodium cavostelioides, were present in both microhabitats.Key words: ecology, mycetozoans, protoctists, slime molds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it