MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057757383 · doi:10.1177/1748048513491893

Reflexive design of the recursive space of virtual worlds

2013· article· en· W2057757383 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Communication Gazette · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflexivityUrbanismArticulation (sociology)SociologyMetaverseIntersection (aeronautics)Embodied cognitionSpace (punctuation)EpistemologyArchitectureVirtual realityAestheticsComputer scienceVisual artsSocial sciencePolitical scienceHuman–computer interactionArtEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article considers the intersection of urbanism and digital culture to theorize a model of mediated urbanism and its application to a designed virtual world for artistic and scientific collaboration. Historical precedents informing the current research include artist networks of the late 1960s and early 1970s that sought to bridge and democratize scientific, technological, and artistic endeavors. The author proposes that mediated urbanism in the reflexive recursive space of virtual worlds references and reworks embodied forms of urbanism and fosters the development of new urbanite forums. The awareness of the nature and history of this articulation may be productively used to inform the design of these emerging virtual forums of knowledge production and artistic creation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it