MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058009531 · doi:10.1093/qjmam/hbp001

On obtaining effective orthotropic elasticity tensors

2009· article· en· W2058009531 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOrthotropic materialTransverse isotropyTensor (intrinsic definition)MathematicsIsotropyMathematical analysisMaxima and minimaMonoclinic crystal systemGeometryPhysicsFinite element methodOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of obtaining the effective orthotropic tensor that corresponds to a given generally anisotropic one; herein, by ‘effective’, we mean the closest in the sense of the Frobenius norm, without a priori assuming the orientation of the orthotropic tensor. It is difficult to find the absolute minimum of the distance function since the minimization process is nonlinear, exhibiting several local minima. To find the effective orthotropic tensor, the minimization process must be performed on a three-dimensional manifold SO(3). In the case of monoclinic and transversely isotropic tensors, it can be performed on a two-dimensional sphere, which lends itself to an insightful plot that allows us to guide a numerical method. We use the orientation of the symmetry-plane normal of the effective monoclinic tensor to guide the method and obtain the effective orthotropic tensor—a two-step process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it