MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058058900 · doi:10.1364/jon.3.000707

Priority scheme for supporting quality of service in optical burst switching networks

2004· article· en· W2058058900 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Optical Networking · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical burst switchingComputer networkQuality of serviceComputer scienceOffset (computer science)Scheduling (production processes)ProvisioningChannel (broadcasting)Service qualityReal-time computingDistributed computingService (business)EngineeringOptical performance monitoringWavelength-division multiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feature Issue on Optical Interconnection Networks (OIN). We present what we believe to be a new scheme, called preemptive prioritized just enough time (PPJET), for quality-of-service (QoS) provisioning in bufferless optical burst switching (OBS) networks. PPJET provides better service for high-priority traffic by dropping reservations belonging to lower-priority traffic with a new channel-scheduling algorithm called preemptive latest-available unused channel with void filling (PLAUC-VF). An approximate method for calculating the dropping probability in PPJET is also discussed. Moreover, we perform discrete-event simulations to evaluate the performance of PPJET. Simulation results show that PPJET outperforms offset-based QoS schemes both in terms of dropping probability and end-to-end delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it