MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058169554 · doi:10.2118/137352-ms

Tight Oil Production Analysis: Adaptation of Existing Rate-Transient Analysis Techniques

2010· article· en· W2058169554 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringPermeability (electromagnetism)GeologyTight oilTight gasHydraulic fracturingPorosityRelative permeabilityTransient analysisMultiphase flowOil productionReservoir simulationFluid dynamicsWell stimulationGeotechnical engineeringReservoir engineeringMechanicsPetroleumEngineeringOil shaleTransient response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Low-permeability (tight) oil reservoirs have emerged as a significant source of oil supply in North America. Hydraulic fracturing techniques combined with horizontal well technology have enabled commercial production from oil and gas reservoirs with absolute permeability < 0.1 md, and recently in gas reservoirs with permeability in the nanodarcy range. Techniques for quantitative analysis of ultra-low permeability reservoirs completed with hydraulically-fractured horizontal wells are in their infancy; complications that have slowed development of these techniques include complex reservoir behavior, such as dual porosity effects, multi-layer behavior, multi-phase flow and non-static absolute permeability, and complex flow behavior associated simultaneous flow of multiple hydraulic fractures into horizontal wells. Although analytical models have been and currently are being developed to simulate well performance associated with these complexities, systematic methods for analyzing production for the purpose of quantifying reservoir and hydraulic fracture properties have not been discussed in detail in the literature for tight oil reservoirs. This paper examines the use of classic rate-transient techniques (flow-regime analysis, type-curve methods and simulation) for analysis of tight oil reservoirs. Single-phase (oil) flow associated with undersaturated black oil reservoirs (above bubble point) is the focus of this work. Simulated cases of multi-fractured horizontal wells completed in single porosity reservoirs, as well as naturally-completed horizontal wells in transient dual porosity reservoirs are analyzed. In all cases, the proposed integrated rate-transient analysis approach provided reasonable estimates of (simulator input) hydraulic fracture and reservoir properties. A field case of a multi-fractured horizontal well completed in a low-permeability area of the Pembina Cardium Field, Western Canada, is also given. Finally, a simplified method for forecasting horizontal wells completed in single and dual porosity media, using inputs derived from flow-regime analysis, is introduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it