MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058289360 · doi:10.2310/7060.2004.19101

Topical Vapocoolant Quickly and Effectively Reduces Vaccine-associated Pain: Results of a Randomized, Single-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study

2006· article· en· W2058289360 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Travel Medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboAnesthesiaTopical anestheticLidocaineRandomized controlled trialSalineLocal anestheticVisual analogue scaleSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive international travel preparation often requires several vaccines. Up to 90% of adults have some fear of injections, mostly due to injection-related pain. Pediatric studies with routine vaccines have shown topical anesthetic EMLA cream (lidocaine and prilocaine, Astra Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and the topical vapocoolant Fluori-Methane (dichlorodifluoromethane and trichlorodifluoromethane, Gebauer Co.) to be equally effective in reducing pain from vaccinations. EMLA cream is expensive and requires a 60-min application, while Fluori-Methane (FM) is immediate in onset of action and inexpensive. Skin anesthesia begins at 10 degrees C. Fluori-Methane can briefly cool the skin to 0 degrees C. METHODS: We studied the effectiveness of topical vapocoolant on adult clients at our international travel clinic in a randomized, controlled trial of topical FM vs. cold (4 degrees C) saline placebo. Using a preset randomization table, participants served as their own controls, receiving placebo/control or active agent (participant blinded) in one arm (left or right), and a similar number of vaccines in the untreated arm. Vaccines were administered according to a set protocol per arm to minimize the risk of bias. Pain was measured using a modified McGill present pain intensity (PPI) pain index. Subjects rated their pain immediately and at 5 min on a six-level scale, noting treated and untreated arms separately. A questionnaire was completed on intervention preferences. Sample size was predetermined to achieve 90% statistical power estimating 25% efficacy (minimum n=172). RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-five participants were enrolled; 93 FM and 92 cold saline placebo. FM-treated arms had a significant reduction in immediate pain compared to untreated arms (pain scale mean 2.2 vs. 3.1; p<.0001), and compared to placebo (mean 2.2 vs. 2.8; p<.01). Delayed pain at 5 min was not affected by FM or control (mean 1.9 vs. 2.0) compared to no intervention (pain scale 1.9). The intervention preference questionnaire indicated that participants did not find FM therapy uncomfortable. They would choose FM therapy in the future, over a cream, especially if a wait was involved. CONCLUSION: The topical vapocoolant Fluori-Methane is an effective, quick, preferred, inexpensive agent for reducing vaccine-associated injection pain for international travel clients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it