MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ion beam analysis of<sup>13</sup>C and deuterium deposition in DIII-D and their removal by<i>in-situ</i>oxygen baking

2011· article· en· W2058677046 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica Scripta · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFusion materials and technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSandia National LaboratoriesNational Nuclear Security Administration
KeywordsDeuteriumDeposition (geology)IonMaterials scienceDIII-DCarbon fibersBeam (structure)PlasmaIon beam analysisIon beamAtomic physicsSeparatrixRadiochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nuclear physicsPhysicsChemistryTokamakChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experiment was conducted in DIII-D to examine carbon deposition when a secondary separatrix is near the wall. The magnetic configuration for this experiment was a biased double-null, similar to that foreseen for ITER. 13C methane was injected toroidally symmetrically near the secondary separatrix into ELMy H-mode deuterium plasmas. The resulting deposition of 13C was determined by nuclear reaction analysis. These results show that very little of the injected 13C was deposited at the primary separatrix, whereas a large fraction of injected 13C was deposited close to the point of injection near the secondary separatrix. Six of the tiles were put back into DIII-D, where they were baked at 350–360 °C for 2 h at ∼1 kPa in a 20% O2/80% He gas mixture. Subsequent ion beam analysis of these tiles showed that about 21% of the 13C and 54% of the deuterium were removed by the bake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it