MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058778230 · doi:10.1017/s0829320100009595

L'appartenance aux communautés inuit du Nunavik: un cas de réception de l'ordre juridique inuit?.

2008· article· fr· W2058778230 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Identity, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceEthnologyArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Les Inuit du Nunavik se sont récemment vu reconnaître le pouvoir de déterminer eux-mêmes, au moyen de leurs «coutumes et traditions», qui est un Inuk pouvant bénéficier des avantages découlant de la Convention de la Baie James et du Nord québécois. Ce renvoi à l'ordre juridique autochtone apparaît d'autant plus singulier que l'État canadien cherche habituellement à garder un contrôle serré sur les règles qui régissent l'appartenance aux peuples autochtones. Dans une perspective de pluralisme juridique, le présent texte cherche à cerner les sources potentielles de ces «coutumes et traditions» inuit et à comprendre les raisons qui ont poussé l'ordre juridique canadien à renvoyer à l'ordre juridique inuit, mais aussi à faire apparaître les limites subtiles de ce renvoi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it