MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059103537 · doi:10.1159/000023538

Pituitary Surgery for the Management of Acromegaly

2000· review· en· W2059103537 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHormone Research in Paediatrics · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcromegalyMedicineTranssphenoidal surgeryPituitary adenomaOptic chiasmRadiosurgeryCraniopharyngiomaPituitary tumorsAdenomaMagnetic resonance imagingSurgeryGrowth hormoneInternal medicineRadiologyHormoneRadiation therapyOphthalmologyOptic nerve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Active acromegaly is almost always the result of a benign growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenoma of the pituitary gland. Because the same pituitary stem cell can produce both GH and prolactin (PRL), many acromegalic patients also have hyperprolactinemia. The advantages of surgical excision of pituitary adenomas associated with acromegaly include: (1) prompt decrease in GH; (2) reliable and immediate relief of the mass effect from the tumor (decompression of the optic nerves and chiasm), and (3) the opportunity to obtain tumor tissue for characterization and investigative study. Currently, more than 97% of operations for removal of pituitary tumors associated with acromegaly are done using the transsphenoidal approach rather than craniotomy. Technical advances to make the surgery safer continue to evolve, and include endoscopic approaches, computer-guided image-based intraoperative visualization, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Criteria for satisfactory remission of acromegaly after surgery are the same as those used for medical management. They include normal insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and suppression of GH to undetectable levels (<1.0 ng/ml) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Data from a recent series of 86 patients operated upon for acromegaly at the University of Virginia and followed for more than 1 year have been reviewed. In patients receiving surgery as the initial procedure, 67% had a normal IGF-I, and 52% suppressed to <1.0 ng/ml in an OGTT. There was one true recurrence of disease diagnosed 81 months after surgery. Results are best in patients with noninvasive microadenomas. Gamma knife radiosurgery has been a valuable adjunct in those patients who fail to achieve postoperative remission. Pathological evaluation of the tumors revealed that 16% expressed GH only, 25% stained for GH and glycoprotein hormones (follicle stimulating hormone, thyroid hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, alpha-subunit), 21% for GH and PRL, and 33% for GH, PRL and glycoprotein hormones. There was one acidophil stem cell tumor and 10% had the mammosomatotroph subtype. This contemporary series was free of mortality or serious complications. One patient had a transient cerebrospinal fluid leak and 3 developed transient SIADH with hyponatremia. Surgical treatment remains an important aspect of the combined management of patients with acromegaly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it