MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059103537 · doi:10.1159/000023538

Pituitary Surgery for the Management of Acromegaly

2000· review· en· W2059103537 on OpenAlexaff
Edward R. Laws, Mary Lee Vance, Kamal Thapar

Bibliographic record

VenueHormone Research in Paediatrics · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcromegalyMedicineTranssphenoidal surgeryPituitary adenomaOptic chiasmRadiosurgeryCraniopharyngiomaPituitary tumorsAdenomaMagnetic resonance imagingSurgeryGrowth hormoneInternal medicineRadiologyHormoneRadiation therapyOphthalmologyOptic nerve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Active acromegaly is almost always the result of a benign growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenoma of the pituitary gland. Because the same pituitary stem cell can produce both GH and prolactin (PRL), many acromegalic patients also have hyperprolactinemia. The advantages of surgical excision of pituitary adenomas associated with acromegaly include: (1) prompt decrease in GH; (2) reliable and immediate relief of the mass effect from the tumor (decompression of the optic nerves and chiasm), and (3) the opportunity to obtain tumor tissue for characterization and investigative study. Currently, more than 97% of operations for removal of pituitary tumors associated with acromegaly are done using the transsphenoidal approach rather than craniotomy. Technical advances to make the surgery safer continue to evolve, and include endoscopic approaches, computer-guided image-based intraoperative visualization, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Criteria for satisfactory remission of acromegaly after surgery are the same as those used for medical management. They include normal insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and suppression of GH to undetectable levels (<1.0 ng/ml) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Data from a recent series of 86 patients operated upon for acromegaly at the University of Virginia and followed for more than 1 year have been reviewed. In patients receiving surgery as the initial procedure, 67% had a normal IGF-I, and 52% suppressed to <1.0 ng/ml in an OGTT. There was one true recurrence of disease diagnosed 81 months after surgery. Results are best in patients with noninvasive microadenomas. Gamma knife radiosurgery has been a valuable adjunct in those patients who fail to achieve postoperative remission. Pathological evaluation of the tumors revealed that 16% expressed GH only, 25% stained for GH and glycoprotein hormones (follicle stimulating hormone, thyroid hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, alpha-subunit), 21% for GH and PRL, and 33% for GH, PRL and glycoprotein hormones. There was one acidophil stem cell tumor and 10% had the mammosomatotroph subtype. This contemporary series was free of mortality or serious complications. One patient had a transient cerebrospinal fluid leak and 3 developed transient SIADH with hyponatremia. Surgical treatment remains an important aspect of the combined management of patients with acromegaly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations135
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHormone Research in PaediatricsSame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207