Das System der Televisite zur poststationären Patientenbetreuung im klinischen Einsatz – erste Erfahrungen / The system of televisite in patients care after discharge in clinical use – first experiences
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The televisite is a form of application of telemedicine, that allows a communication between the patient and the family doctor or specialist in the clinic after discharging of hospital. Pioneers for the use of telematic projects have been up to now wide states like the USA, Canada, Norway or Australia to provide, guarantee and maintain by the means of telemedical solutions medical care in geographic regions hardly reachable and of little medical attention. In central Europe and Germany telemedicine is gaining in significance on the one hand because of increasing importance of the cost factor and resulting pressure on the public health system and on the other hand because of the rising demand of the patients for optimised medical care. It specially represents a new form of treatment in patients care after dischargement of hospital. In the year of 2002 a prospective randomised two-armed study was initiated including patients after operative intervention by arthroplasty in posttraumatic contracture of the elbow. The system of the Televisite is used for 6 weeks after dischargement and patients had been controlled ambulant after 6 months including a physical examination. The functional outcome will be scored, the duration of stay in hospital measured, the arising costs for treatment calculated and the satisfaction of the patients in handling the Televisite surveyed. Over this first results showed a shortened stay in hospital together with lowered costs in medical treatment on the one hand and on the other no difference in functional outcome could be found in comparison to the control group by additionally high grade of satisfaction with the new system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it