Macromolecules Containing Redox-Active Neutral and Cationic Iron Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions of chloroarene cyclopentadienyliron complexes were utilized to prepare new classes of oligomers and polymers containing both neutral and cationic organoiron complexes in their structures. Photolysis of these polymers resulted in the removal of the cationic cyclopentadienyliron moieties, while the neutral organoiron complexes remained intact within the polymer structures. The weight-average molecular weights of these polymers after photolysis ranged from 8700 to 56 200 with polydispersities from 1.1 to 3.1. Thermal analysis established that the cationic polymers possess higher glass transition temperatures, but lower thermal stability than the neutral ferrocene-based polymers. The glass transition temperatures of the cationic polymers ranged from 65 to 161 °C, while the T g s of the neutral polymers ranged from 10 to 92 °C. Electrochemical studies showed that the iron centers in the neutral complexes were oxidized, while the cationic complexes were reduced. Viscosity studies showed that the cationic polymers exhibited a polyelectrolyte effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".