MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059757400 · doi:10.2495/sdp-v3-n3-242-256

Developing a green agricultural extension theory

2008· article· en· W2059757400 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kurosh Rezaei‐Moghaddam, E A Karami

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtension (predicate logic)Agricultural extensionSustainabilityModernization theoryAgricultureGreen RevolutionAgricultural machineryEconomic systemEconomicsEnvironmental planningEnvironmental economicsComputer scienceGeographyEconomic growthEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to use the case of Iran to examine the basic premises of the ecological moderni zation (EM) and de-modernization (DM) theories with regard to agricultural extension policies to generate a green theory for agricultural extension.We argue that extension activities do not promote sustainability, so that technologies presented by extension are unsustainable.It is necessary to rethink seriously the activities, missions, and efforts of extension.It can be argued that agricultural extension should be reinvented.Two competing polar conceptual paths for agricultural extension are presented by EM and DM theories.These two paths are used to reconstruct the theoretical basis of agricultural extension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicRural development and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207