Bitwise data parallelism in regular expression matching
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new parallel algorithm for regular expression matching is developed and applied to the classical grep (global regular expression print) problem. Building on the bitwise data parallelism previously applied to the manual implementation of token scanning in the Parabix XML parser, the new algorithm represents a general solution to the problem of regular expression matching using parallel bit streams. On widely-deployed commodity hardware using 128-bit SSE2 SIMD technology, our algorithm implementations can substantially outperform traditional grep implementations based on NFAs, DFAs or backtracking. 5X or better performance advantage against the best of available competitors is not atypical. The algorithms are also designed to scale with the availability of additional parallel resources such as the wider SIMD facilities (256-bit) of Intel AVX2 or future 512-bit extensions. Our AVX2 implementation showed dramatic reduction in instruction count and significant improvement in speed. Our GPU implementations show further acceleration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it