MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059878982 · doi:10.1039/b003764h

Aluminium(III) hydration in aqueous solution. A Raman spectroscopic investigation and an ab initio molecular orbital study of aluminium(III) water clusters

2000· article· en· W2059878982 on OpenAlexaff
Wolfram W. Rudolph, Roger A. Mason, Cory C. Pye

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPerchlorateAb initioRaman spectroscopyAqueous solutionAluminiumIonMolecular vibrationChlorideAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Ab initio quantum chemistry methodsInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryComputational chemistryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Raman spectra of aqueous Al(III) chloride, nitrate, and perchlorate solutions were measured over a broad concentration (0.21–3.14 mol L−1) and temperature (25–125°C) range. The weak, polarized band at 525 cm−1 and two depolarized modes at 438 and 332 cm−1 have been assigned to ν1(a1g), ν2(eg) and ν5(f2g) of the hexaaquaaluminium(III) ion, respectively. The IR-active mode at 598 cm−1 has been assigned to ν3(f1u). The vibrational analysis of the species [Al(OH2)63+] was done on the basis of Oh symmetry (OH2 as point mass). The polarized mode ν1(a1g) AlO6 has been followed over the full temperature range and band parameters (band maximum, full width at half height and band intensity) have been examined. The position of the ν1(a1g) AlO6 mode shifts only about 3 cm−1 to lower frequencies and broadens about 20 cm−1 for a 100°C temperature increase. The Raman spectroscopic data suggest that the hexaaquaaluminium(III) ion is thermodynamically stable in chloride, nitrate and perchlorate solutions over the temperature and concentration range measured. No inner-sphere complexes in these solutions could be detected spectroscopically. Aluminium sulfate solutions show a different picture and thermodynamically stable aluminium sulfato complexes could be detected. The sulfato complexes are entropically driven, so that their formation is favoured at higher temperatures. Ab initio geometry optimizations and frequency calculations of [Al(OH2)63+] were carried out at the Hartree–Fock and second-order Møller–Plesset levels of theory, using various basis sets up to 6-31 + G*. The global minimum structure of the hexaaqua Al(III) species corresponds to symmetry Th. The unscaled vibrational frequencies of the [Al(OH2)63+] were reported. The unscaled vibrational frequencies of the AlO6 unit are lower than the experimental frequencies (ca. 15%), but scaling the frequencies reproduces the measured frequencies. The theoretical binding enthalpy for [Al(OH2)63+] was calculated and accounts for ca. 64% of the experimental single ion hydration enthalpy for Al(III). Ab initio geometry optimizations and frequency calculations are also reported for the [Al(OH2)183+] (Al[6 + 12]) cluster with 6 water molecules in the first sphere and 12 water molecules in the second sphere. The global minimum corresponds to T symmetry. Calculated frequencies of the aluminium [6 + 12] cluster correspond with the observed frequencies in solution. The ν1 AlO6 (unscaled, HF/6-31G*) mode occurs at 542 cm−1, in fair agreement with the experimental value. The theoretical binding enthalpy for [Al(OH2)183+] was calculated and is a slightly underestimate of the experimental single ion hydration enthalpy for Al(III). The water molecules of the first sphere form strong H-bonds with water molecules in the second hydration shell because of the strong polarizing effect of the Al(III) ion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations145
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207