MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059928624 · doi:10.1109/icip.2013.6738327

Confidence interval based motion estimation

2013· article· en· W2059928624 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCoding (social sciences)Computational complexity theoryCoding tree unitMotion estimationBit rateRate distortionAlgorithmConfidence intervalContext-adaptive binary arithmetic codingRate–distortion optimizationAlgorithmic efficiencyInferenceMultiview Video CodingComputer visionReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceDecoding methodsMathematicsData compressionStatisticsVideo processingVideo tracking

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new video standard called High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) is now being finalized. In comparison with the H.264/AVC video coding standard, HEVC further improves video coding rate distortion (RD) performance, but at the price of significant increase in its encoding complexity, especially in its motion estimation (ME). To reduce the ME complexity in HEVC while maintaining its RD performance, in this paper, we first formulate ME as a statistical inference problem and then propose a confidence interval based ME method. It is shown by experiments that, for the four test sequences with higher searching complexity under low delay main, our proposed ME method further reduces the integer level ME time of the fast search in HEVC by 73.49% on average with only 1.22% increase in bit rate and 0.024dB loss in PSNR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it