MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060001192 · doi:10.1115/imece2010-40462

Fast Prediction of Temperature Evolution in Electronic Devices for Run-Time Thermal Management Applications

2010· article· en· W2060001192 on OpenAlexaff
Yizhang Yang, Sridhar Sundaram, Gamal Refai-Ahmed, Maxat Touzelbaev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputationInfinite impulse responseConvolution (computer science)Time domainTransient (computer programming)Electronic engineeringFinite element methodFinite impulse responseTransient responseImpulse responsePower (physics)AlgorithmComputational scienceDigital filterFilter (signal processing)Electrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increase of non-uniform power density and high switching frequency has presented new challenges in predicting transient temperature response to fast-changing power inputs in advanced electronic devices. While the computational effort with direct calculation through the finite element model (FEM) is expensive, various methods of model reduction with drastically improved computing speed have been developed for calculation of dynamic thermal responses of the electronic systems. However, those methods’ still-considerable computational time consumption inhibits their practices in real-time temperature prediction and dynamic thermal management (DTM) applications. This work presents a fast algorithm for predicting temperature evolution in electronic devices subjected to multiple heat source excitations. It utilizes the equivalent thermal RC network for model reductions, and adopts recursive infinite impulse response (IIR) digital filters for accelerated computation in discrete time-domain. The algorithm is validated by comparison to existing convolution integral methods, yielding excellent agreement with several orders of magnitude improvement in computation efficiency. Due to its simplicity in implementation, the algorithm is very suitable for run-time evaluation of temperature response for dynamic power management applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207